SARS-CoV-2 antigen rapid tests and universal screening for COVID-19 Omicron variant among hospitalized children.

BACKGROUND: Clinical utility of universal antigen rapid test (ART) in the pediatric setting is unknown. We aimed to assess the performance and utility of universal ART in hospitalized children (≥5-year-old) to prevent nosocomial COVID-19 transmission. METHODS: Cross-sectional study involving all hospitalized pediatric patients aged ≥5-year-old from 2 periods during Omicron wave. Clinical data, ART and polymerase chain reaction test results were collected. RESULTS: A total of 444 patients were included from the 2 study periods, and 416 patients (93.7%) had concordant results between ART and polymerase chain reaction. The overall sensitivity and specificity of ART were 83.3% (95% CI: 75.2-89.3) and 97.5% (95% CI: 95.0-98.8), respectively. Negative predictive values of ART between the Omicron emergence and Omicron peak periods for a probable case group were 71.4% and 66.7%, respectively, and for a suspect case group 91.4% and 75.0%, respectively. Negative predictive values for an unlikely case group was >95% in both periods. Positive predictive value of ART was >85% for probable and suspect case groups in both periods. Seventy-five percent of patients (n = 15) who were incorrectly classified as SARS-CoV-2 negative by ART had potentially viable virus. No large nosocomial transmission clusters were detected. CONCLUSIONS: Universal ART screening may limit nosocomial outbreaks in hospitalized children. The performance can be optimized by considering clinical symptoms, exposure and periods within COVID waves.

Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children in Singapore.

INTRODUCTION: Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) is a rare inflammatory syndrome with multisystem involvement affecting children exposed to COVID-19. This condition is rarely reported in East Asia and was not detected in Singapore until 2021. We present 12 cases of MIS-C diagnosed in KK Women's and Children's Hospital (KKH) from October 2021 to December 2021. METHOD: We conducted an observational study on cases fulfilling the Singapore Ministry of Health criteria for MIS-C from January 2020 to December 2021 in KKH. Medical records were reviewed to obtain information on clinical presentation, disease course, treatment received and outcomes. RESULTS: In the 12 cases detected, the median age was 7.50 years (interquartile range 4.00-9.25); 8 were male. All patients had mucocutaneous symptoms similar to Kawasaki disease. Other commonly involved systems were: haematological (coagulopathy 100%, lymphopaenia 91.70% and thrombocytopaenia 75.00%), gastrointestinal (75.00%) and cardiovascular (83.30%). Six patients (50.00%) had shock and were admitted to the intensive care unit. The majority of patients received treatment within 2 days of hospitalisation with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) and steroids. All survived; the majority had normal echocardiograms and no long-term organ sequelae at 6 months post-discharge. CONCLUSION: MIS-C emerged in Singapore as the incidence of COVID-19 in the community increased in 2021. The clinical presentation of our patients is similar to earlier reports, with some significant differences from Kawasaki disease. Multidisciplinary management, timely diagnosis, and early initiation of treatment with IVIg and steroids likely contributed to comparatively good outcomes. Our cases highlight the need for continued awareness of MIS-C among physicians, and surveillance of its incidence, short- and long-term outcomes.

Safety of Pfizer-BioNtech COVID-19 Vaccine in Healthcare Workers, Singapore

Background On 14 December 2020, the Pfizer-BioNTech coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine was granted emergency use authorization in Singapore. Healthcare workers (HCW) were prioritized to receive the vaccine. We aim to investigate the side effects and risk factors for allergic reactions in our institution. Methods All HCW vaccinations were recorded in an electronic centralized database. All reactions occurring within a 30-minute observation period post vaccination were recorded. Staff were required to report any vaccine-related medical consult including hospitalization occurring within 14 days after vaccination. Moderate/severe reactions were assessed by a medical team and determined if the reactions were probable allergic reactions with consultation with an Allergist. We extracted data from 8 Jan 2021 to 30 April 2021. Results 5030 and 159 HCW completed 2 doses and 1 dose of the vaccine respectively. There were 1056 HCWs (20.3%) with self-reported pre-existing allergy. There were 114 (1.1%) reactions occurring without the 30-minute observation period, and 64 (56.1%) were related to first dose of vaccine. The most common side effect experienced was aches or pain on any part of the body (n=46, 40.4%) followed by fatigue and/or giddiness (n=45, 39.5%), palpitations and/or shortness of breath (n=22, 19.3%), systemic rash and/or angioedema (n=12, 10.5%) and nausea and/or vomiting (n=12, 10.5%). A total of 23 HCWs complained of systemic rash and/or angioedema that occurred anytime post vaccination. Fifteen HCWs (0.29% of the cohort) were considered to have probable allergic reaction to the vaccine. None of the reactions were classified as anaphylaxis or severe reactions, but 4 HCWs required short hospitalization stay for observation. HCWs with pre-existing allergy had 2.6 times the risk of having probable vaccine-related allergic reaction than HCWs without pre-existing allergy (RR 2.6, 95% CI 0.9 to 7.3, p=0.068) but this was not statistically significant. Conclusion No anaphylaxis or severe reactions were observed in our institution. Acute side effects in our cohort were in line with published trial reports. We noted a raised relative risk of 2.6 of pre-existing allergy with probable vaccine-related allergic reaction but this was not statistically significant. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

A Virus-Specific Immune Rheostat in the Immunome of Patients Recovering From Mild COVID-19.

An accurate depiction of the convalescent COVID-19 immunome will help delineate the immunological milieu crucial for disease resolution and protection. Using mass cytometry, we characterized the immune architecture in patients recovering from mild COVID-19. We identified a virus-specific immune rheostat composed of an effector T (Teff) cell recall response that is balanced by the enrichment of a highly specialized regulatory T (Treg) cell subset. Both components were reactive against a peptide pool covering the receptor binding domain (RBD) of the SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein. We also observed expansion of IFNγ+ memory CD4+ T cells and virus-specific follicular helper T (TFH) cells. Overall, these findings pinpoint critical immune effector and regulatory mechanisms essential for a potent, yet harmless resolution of COVID-19 infection.

Clinical Utility of Buccal Swabs for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Detection in Coronavirus Disease 2019-Infected Children.

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) was detected from at least 1 buccal specimen in 9 of 11 coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-infected children (81.8%). Viral loads in buccal specimens were substantially lower than those in nasopharyngeal specimens. Buccal swabs are not good as COVID-19 screening specimens in children.

Household Transmission of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 from Adults to Children.

Knowledge of transmission dynamics of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 from adults to children in household settings is limited. We found an attack rate among 213 children in 137 households to be 6.1% in households with confirmed adult 2019 novel coronavirus disease index case(s). Transmission from adult to child occurred in only 5.2% of households. Young children <5 years old were at lowest risk of infection (1.3%). Children were most likely to be infected if the household index case was the mother.

Novel Coronavirus 2019 Transmission Risk in Educational Settings.

Transmission risk of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in schools is unknown. Our investigations, especially in preschools, could not detect SARS-CoV-2 transmission despite screening of symptomatic and asymptomatic children. The data suggest that children are not the primary drivers of SARS-CoV-2 transmission in schools and could help inform exit strategies for lifting of lockdowns.